Executive resignations

Several important points must be distinguished in considering the resignations of the secretary and treasurer of this association.

First, that resignation of executive members at this time of the year—while undesirable—is not to be deplored.

It does not create a lack of leadership at a crucial time.

The second is that Messrs Tate and Lawrence may well be correct that the NZUSU payment was not properly ratified. It should be clearly realised that in opposing the payment they are being consistent with their declared principles.

Thirdly, in attempting to prevent the payment of the NZUSU levy despite a constitutional direction from executive to do so, they attempted to overthrow a democratic system of control by totalitarian means.

The fourth is that the two main allegations of Mr. Lawrence (financial irregularities and losing the confidence of the Wellington business community) are completely unfounded in fact and cannot be substantiated.

The fifth is that in issuing press statements about a domestic disagreement they showed a fantastic lack of concern for the reputation of this association.

Both Mr. Lawrence and, in particular, Mr. Tate, have made considerable sacrifices for the welfare of this association. It might well have been that, had they allowed themselves to be over-ruled and then forced the issue by constitutional means this term, they would have received considerable support.

Instead, they have severely damaged the name of this association and caused quite baseless speculation and rumour about its affairs.—H.B.R.