Other formats

    Adobe Portable Document Format file (facsimile images)   TEI XML file   ePub eBook file  

Connect

    mail icontwitter iconBlogspot iconrss icon

Salient. Victoria University Student Newspaper. Volume 36, Number 16. 12th July 1973

To: The Faculty of and Administration Subject: Toward a studentio of 100/1

To: The Faculty [unclear: of] and Administration Subject: Toward a [unclear: studentio] of 100/1

At a recent faculty meeting I [unclear: sugges] we establish as one fo our goals, the attainment of a largre student/staff ratio rather than a smaller one. [unclear: Because] [unclear: sebbled] primarily to consider our Quinquennial Submission, there was not time to consider the mattre with the [unclear: caes] I did accept an invitation to prepare a memo on the subject. This note is a partial response to that [unclear: invitation]

My proposal has two major elements [unclear: mance] and technology.

What I mean by performance is [unclear: th] [unclear: nstructional] objective is cast in this way, When you have completed this learning unit, you will know x', or this [unclear: Wve] completed this learning unit, you will be able to do y'. What we teach is measured against these performance [unclear: otoes] our teaching contribute to the attainment of the objective? (How do we know) What our student learn is also [unclear: meinst] them. What counts in a performance-based learning system is what a student knows and following simples statement:

When [unclear: yopleted] this learning unit you will [unclear: tolve] system of linear, [unclear: inhomoge] the method of determinants.

Collection of such statements [unclear: denaged] [unclear: nventory] of learning units. From these, presented to him in advance, each student selects those he prefers. The [unclear: inver] [unclear: naged] with the aid of technology.

It is not easy to write a [unclear: performance] [unclear: ve]. It is not easy to produce ordered collections of performance objectives and the learning resources used by [unclear: student] them. It is not easy to measure and evaluate the performance of learning resources. Since this memo is not [unclear: at] [unclear: manee], I will defer to a later time additional remarks about the subject and present some suggestions for your [unclear: conside]

This memo is about technology, [unclear: ai] [unclear: ance] of its use in an educational institution as reported in the May 1973 issue of Saturday Review of Education. [unclear: Ac] [unclear: e] article is attached. (You might find it interesting to examine more of the issue much of which is devoted to [unclear: "edua] technology.

I chose this article to present [unclear: my] [unclear: illy)] because it mentions 1) a higher-than-average student/staff ratio of 36/1; 2) a lower-than-average cost per [unclear: student] [unclear: oved] student performance; and 4) Staff satisfaction. That does sound like the millenium, I know, a chimera, [unclear: but] [unclear: nd] it to your attention anyway.

I see the technology-as-an-aid-to-[unclear: e] [unclear: roblem] first and foremost as an investment problem: 1) What is the return [unclear: on] the investment? and 2) Where do [unclear: v] [unclear: capital]? It seemed appropriate to make my remarks in the context of our quin quennial submission and to [unclear: bring] [unclear: u] attention, now, in preparation for the coming budget exercise.

Robert M. Gordon

Information Science